Judicial Oversight Controversy in Colorado: Anonymous Complaint Dismissed
Denver, CO — The Colorado Commission on Judicial Discipline has quietly dismissed a sweeping anonymous complaint that alleged a conspiracy among judges to conceal misconduct, raising concerns among state lawmakers. This decision came during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, initially routine in nature, to confirm the reappointments of commission members Mindy Sooter and Jim Carpenter.
Christopher Gregory, the former director of the commission, had requested federal investigations into the scandal, which dates back to 2019, involving a controversial contract designed to secure silence regarding alleged judicial misconduct. Gregory described the alleged scheme as a “public corruption” crisis and urged the Senate to delay the reappointment votes for further inquiry.
Despite the serious nature of the allegations—spanning a 330-page complaint supplemented with 3,100 pages of evidence—no clear rationale was provided for the dismissal. The commission’s rules dictate dismissal when allegations lack credibility or fall outside its jurisdiction.
Senator Julie Gonzales, who read the entire complaint, expressed her deep concern over its contents. The document accuses several high-ranking officials, including Colorado Supreme Court justices, of misusing public funds and resources to conceal misconduct. It claims a pattern of intimidation and retaliation that has cost taxpayers over $4 million since 2019.
The scandal intensified after it was revealed that then-Chief Justice Nathan “Ben” Coats approved a contract with Mindy Masias, a former Judicial Department Chief of Staff. Critics contend that the commission’s failure to address the anonymous complaint reflects ongoing issues within the judicial system.
As the Senate awaits a new vote concerning the appointments, the controversy continues to spotlight the need for transparency and accountability in Colorado’s judiciary.
Source
Photo credit denvergazette.com
