Federal Judge Questions U.S. Government’s Interest in Tina Peters Conviction
In a recent hearing, Chief U.S. Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak expressed confusion over the U.S. government’s assertion of interest in the case of former Mesa County clerk Tina Peters. Peters was convicted in 2024 for a security breach of her office’s voting equipment and is currently serving a nine-year prison sentence. The U.S. Department of Justice filed a statement of interest in Peters’ federal petition for habeas corpus, questioning whether her prosecution was politically motivated.
During the hearing, Varholak pressed the Justice Department’s attorney for evidence of political motivation behind Peters’ prosecution, to which the attorney did not provide a clear response. The state, litigating against Peters, argued that the government’s involvement was an attempt to intimidate the court and prosecutors on behalf of a political ally, with no precedence for such federal intervention in state criminal prosecutions.
Peters, who has claimed her prosecution was politically motivated, sought release on bond while her appeal is being reviewed. The Justice Department’s statement added a layer of complexity to the case, leading to a debate over the government’s true interests. Varholak granted the parties a week to submit further arguments on the issue. Ultimately, this case raises questions about the boundaries of federal involvement in state criminal matters.
Source
Photo credit denvergazette.com
