Winnipeg Jets goaltender Connor Hellebuyck is frustrated by the lack of clarity surrounding goaltender interference in the NHL, despite his efforts to contribute to the discussion. The issue was a hot topic at the recent general managers’ meeting, with only two out of 54 video clips showing unanimous agreement on interference calls. The rule, outlined in the NHL rulebook, allows for incidental contact but prohibits intentional or deliberate interference with a goalie. This ambiguity has led to 105 coach’s challenges for interference this season, with varying outcomes.
Teams are advised to have video evidence before challenging a call, as losing a challenge results in a minor penalty. Florida Panthers coach Paul Maurice follows a checklist before challenging, considering input from his goalie coach, video team, and his gut feeling. However, in the playoffs, Maurice admits that his decision may be influenced by whether his goalie is upset.
The interpretations of the rule differ among coaches, with Avalanche coach Jared Bednar challenging a play out of spite in a recent game against Buffalo. Despite the complexity of the rule, NHL director of officiating Stephen Walkom believes that teams have been informed about the standard. The issue of interference was highlighted in a unique incident in a game where nachos were thrown onto the ice, but the goal was still allowed to stand.
Overall, the confusion surrounding goaltender interference continues to be a point of contention in the NHL, with coaches, players, and officials expressing differing opinions on what constitutes interference.
Source
Note: The image is for illustrative purposes only and is not the original image of the presented article.
