A baby elephant stole the limelight from a reporter outside an elephant orphanage in Kenya, showcasing its adorable charm. In a related story, an animal rights group is advocating for the release of five elephants from a Colorado zoo, claiming they are unlawfully confined and able to challenge their captivity. The Colorado Supreme Court is set to hear arguments from the NonHuman Rights Project and the Cheyenne Mountain Zoo, where the elephants have lived for decades.
The group argues that the highly intelligent and social elephants should be able to challenge their captivity, seeking their release to an unspecified sanctuary. The zoo, on the other hand, believes that moving the elephants at their age could be cruel and cause unnecessary stress. They claim to provide tailored care for the elephants based on their individual needs and preferences.
The legal issue at hand is whether or not the elephants are considered legal persons, capable of pursuing a petition of habeas corpus challenging their detention. This is similar to a previous case in New York involving an elephant named Happy, where the court ruled that giving such rights to an elephant would have a destabilizing impact on society.
The Colorado zoo believes that the NonHuman Rights Project is not genuinely concerned about the elephants’ well-being, but rather seeking to establish a precedent to challenge animal captivity in general. The outcome of this case will have implications for how animals are perceived and treated under the law.
Source
Photo credit www.livenowfox.com